View all Webinars

Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner

Close     Close Mobile Menu

IP Master Class Series Webinar | June 07

Responding to Alice/101 Rejections After Berkheimer

Thursday, June 07, 2018 at 1:00 PM (CT)

Overview

In February, an important decision was given in the Berkheimer v. HP case that changed the way patent practitioners respond to Alice/101 rejections.  In this complimentary webinar, we’ll take a step back and provide real-life examples of how patentability for theoretical inventions have changed over time.  We’ll also compare practitioner strategies that have succeeded and failed with the USPTO since the Alice decision and provide you with practical tips to consider in your practice.

Presenters

Kirt Iverson | Intellectual Property Attorney

Kirt Iverson

Principal Attorney
Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner

Timothy Singleton | Intellectual Property Attorney

Timothy Singleton

Attorney
Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner

Share

Please contact Bryan Ness at bness@slwip.com with any questions.

*1 hour of CLE credit will be applied for in California

Responding to Alice/101 Rejections After Berkheimer

Thursday, June 07, 2018 at 1:00 PM (CT)

In February, an important decision was given in the Berkheimer v. HP case that changed the way patent practitioners respond to Alice/101 rejections.  In this complimentary webinar, we’ll take a step back and provide real-life examples of how patentability for theoretical inventions have changed over time.  We’ll also compare practitioner strategies that have succeeded and failed with the USPTO since the Alice decision and provide you with practical tips to consider in your practice.

Presenters

Kirt Iverson | Intellectual Property Attorney

Kirt Iverson

Principal Attorney
Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner

Timothy Singleton | Intellectual Property Attorney

Timothy Singleton

Principal Attorney
Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner

Please contact Bryan Ness at bness@slwip.com with any questions.

* 1 hour of CLE credit will be applied for in California

Share