Insights

Stay Up to Date on the Latest News and Events from SLW

One Antibody, One Claim, One Hundred Million Dollars: The Power of Strategic Means-Plus-Function Claiming in the Life Sciences

In the world of patent law, a single claim can be worth a fortune. A real-life example of this can be found in the ongoing IP dispute between Xencor, Inc. and Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., where Xencor’s recently issued patent, which issued with just one claim, underlies Xencor’s expectations for 100-120 million dollars in additional US […]

Enablement Challenges in Quantum Computing Patents: Lessons from Recent PTAB Cases

The quantum computing revolution is generating groundbreaking innovations – and equally complex patent prosecution challenges. Among these challenges, enablement requirements under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) have emerged as a particularly thorny issue for patent practitioners working in this field.

Recent decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reveal a troubling pattern: even well-represented corporate applicants are struggling to satisfy enablement requirements for quantum computing inventions. Understanding why these applications failed – and what succeeded – offers critical guidance for practitioners navigating this emerging technology landscape.

What Is Quantum Computing and Why Should Patent Practitioners Care?

If you have been hearing the phrase “quantum computing” more and more lately and wondering what it actually means for your patent practice, you are not alone. Quantum computing is a subset of quantum technology, which is one of the most rapidly developing fields in science and engineering today. Quantum technology spans sensing, communication, and computing technologies, with quantum computing being the fastest growing quantum technology.

WURC vs. WORK: The Evidentiary Asymmetry Between § 101’s “Inventive Concept” and § 103’s Obviousness Framework 

On February 6, 2026, the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for all asserted claims across six patents in Innovaport LLC v. Target Corp., No. 24-1545 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2026) (nonprecedential). The patents claimed systems and methods for providing product location information within a retail store: receiving a customer’s query, searching a database containing product locations and related information, and returning results that included cross-referenced product suggestions. The court found the claims directed to the abstract idea of “collecting, analyzing, retrieving, and displaying information” at Alice step one, then concluded at step two that the additional elements added no “inventive concept.”